<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link Digest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.klustered.com/2008/04/03/link-digest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.klustered.com/2008/04/03/link-digest/</link>
	<description>Andrew Fledderjohann sporadically spins special speculation</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Fledderjohann</title>
		<link>http://blog.klustered.com/2008/04/03/link-digest/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fledderjohann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.klustered.com/2008/04/03/link-digest/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Ahmet, I think it's a great solution to get the Flash/Flex content indexable, but I guess my question was more about the quality of the ranking.

If we look at the &lt;a href="http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:aDuLHqIlSPcJ:directory.onflex.org/+http://directory.onflex.org/&#038;hl=en&#038;gl=us&#038;strip=0" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google cache&lt;/a&gt; of the Flex directory, it's just spitting the raw data. I realize that you could use XSLT to truly transform over and format appropriately all the information (in the case of the directory a lot of important information is just being stored in non-standard attributes of &lt;code&gt;div&lt;/code&gt; tags) but I'm just curious if, specifically Google, would rank a completely static, semantic HTML site differently than a semantic XSLT transformation of an XML document.

I really think your solution is very elegant though and will keep it in mind for future developments of mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmet, I think it&#8217;s a great solution to get the Flash/Flex content indexable, but I guess my question was more about the quality of the ranking.</p>
<p>If we look at the <a href="http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:aDuLHqIlSPcJ:directory.onflex.org/+http://directory.onflex.org/&#038;hl=en&#038;gl=us&#038;strip=0" rel="nofollow">Google cache</a> of the Flex directory, it&#8217;s just spitting the raw data. I realize that you could use XSLT to truly transform over and format appropriately all the information (in the case of the directory a lot of important information is just being stored in non-standard attributes of <code>div</code> tags) but I&#8217;m just curious if, specifically Google, would rank a completely static, semantic HTML site differently than a semantic XSLT transformation of an XML document.</p>
<p>I really think your solution is very elegant though and will keep it in mind for future developments of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmet</title>
		<link>http://blog.klustered.com/2008/04/03/link-digest/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.klustered.com/2008/04/03/link-digest/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>About the SEO Model, you can see a working version here:
http://directory.onflex.org/

The content is well indexed by search engines :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the SEO Model, you can see a working version here:<br />
<a href="http://directory.onflex.org/" rel="nofollow">http://directory.onflex.org/</a></p>
<p>The content is well indexed by search engines <img src='http://blog.klustered.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian, Onyx Design</title>
		<link>http://blog.klustered.com/2008/04/03/link-digest/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian, Onyx Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.klustered.com/2008/04/03/link-digest/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking back to my article, I'm glad you like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking back to my article, I&#8217;m glad you like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
